Cattle Rumen Microorganisms Hydrolysis for Switchgrass Saccharification, Volatile Fatty Acids and Methane Production

Main Article Content

Florendo, P. DC.
Sharma-shivappa, R.
Fellner, V.

Abstract

This study had determined the effect of duration on processes of saccharification, volatile fatty acids and methane gas in switchgrass hydrolysis using cattle rumen microorganisms. Inputs to fermentation were 2g milled switchgrass, 10ml strained Holstein cattle rumen fluid and 88ml distilled water with headspace using a 150 ml capacity serum bottle. Hydrolysis pH was neutralized with alkaline solution; sealed fermentation bottles with butyl cap and aluminium crimp and incubated at 37oC with periodic shaking of 75 revolutions per minute. Fermentation was stopped at duration 6, 14, 38, 44, 68 and 92 hours. Contents of saccharides in hydrolysates were evaluated using High pressure liquid chromatography and Dinitrosalycilic acid assay while volatile fatty acids and methane gas produced at different durations were estimated by Gas chromatography. Results showed duration’s significant effect on saccharification hydrolyzed carbohydrates, highest rate of 3.97 %/hr at 6 hr and highest carbohydrates conversion efficiency of 71.2% at 92 hr(p>0.05).  Acetate, iso-butyrate and butyrate were gradually produced at different periods while volatile fatty acids total content of 14.35mM obtained at 92 hr implied duration’s significant impact on volatile fatty acid production in switchgrass using cattle rumen microbes(p>0.05). Methane gas showed significant and highest yield of 16.38mM/ ml at 44 hr and lowest yield at 92 hr duration(p>0.05). In conclusion, switchgrass hydrolysis using cattle rumen microorganisms’ fermentation processes produce hydrolyzed carbohydrates, acetate, isobutyrate and butyrate, total volatile fatty acids and methane gas. Duration of the pretreatment of switchgrass with rumen microbes is a vital factor that affects the processes of saccharification, volatile fatty acids and methane production.  Information generated in the study are essential in the development of rumen microorganisms as pretreatment of switchgrass as animal feeds, biomass for bioethanol, volatile fatty acids and methane gas production.

Article Details

How to Cite
Florendo, P. DC., Sharma-shivappa, R., & Fellner, V. (2018). Cattle Rumen Microorganisms Hydrolysis for Switchgrass Saccharification, Volatile Fatty Acids and Methane Production. International Journal of Agricultural Technology, 14(1), 31–43. retrieved from https://li04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/IJAT/article/view/5859
Section
Original Study

References

Ahring, B. K. (2008). Perspectives for anaerobic digestion. In Biomethanation Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. pp. 1-30.

Akuzawa, M., Hori, T., Haruta, S., Ueno, Y., Ishii, M. and Igarashi, Y. (2011). Distinctive responses of metabolically active microbiota to acidification in a thermophilic anaerobic digester. Microbial ecology 61:595-605.

Bals, B., Rogers, C., Jin, M., Balan, V. and Dale, B. (2010). Evaluation of ammonia fibre expansion (AFEX) pretreatment for enzymatic hydrolysis of switchgrass harvested in different seasons and locations. Biotechnology for biofuels 3:1.

Burns, J. C., Godshalk, E. B. and Timothy, D. H. (2008a). Registration of 'BoMaster' switchgrass. Journal of plant registrations, 2:31-32.

Burns, J. C., Godshalk, E. B., and Timothy, D. H., (2008b). Registration of ‘Performer’ Switchgrass. Journal of Plant Registration 2:29-30.

CERES (2008). Biofuel Advantages Projections of Per Acre Fuel Yield. Retrieved from http//www.ceres.net.

Chen, Y. R. R. Sharma and Chen, C. (2007a). Ensiling Agricultural Residue for Bioethanol Production. Applied Biochem Biotechnology 143:80-92.

Chen, Y., Sharma-Shivappa, R. R., Keshwani, D. and Chen, C. (2007). Potential of agricultural residues and hay for bioethanol production. Applied biochemistry and biotechnology 142:276-290.

Franke-Whittle I. H, Walter, A., Ebner, C., Insam, H. (2014). Investigation into the Effect of High Concentrations of Volatile fatty acids in Anaerobic digestion on Methanogenic communities. International Journal of Integrated Waste Management, Science and Technology 34:2080-2089.

Garlock R. J, Balan V. and Dale, B. E (2012). Optimization of AFEX pretreatment conditions and enzyme mixtures to maximize sugar release from upland and lowland switchgrass. Bioresource Technology 104:757:68.

Jin M. J., Lau, M. W., Balan, V., Dale, B. E., Yuan, Y. J. (2010). Two step SSCF to convert AFEX treated switchgrass to ethanol using commercial enzymes and Saccharomyces cerevisiea 424A (LNH-ST). Bioresource Technology 101:871-8.

Goux, X., Calusinska, M., Lemaigre, S., Marynowska, M., Klocke, M., Udelhoven, T. and Delfosse, P. (2015). Microbial community dynamics in replicate anaerobic digesters exposed sequentially to increasing organic loading rate, acidosis, and process recovery. Biotechnology for biofuels 8:122.

Grant, R. J. and Mertens D. R. (1992). Impact of in vitro Fermentation Techniques upon Kinetics of Fiber Digestion. Journal of Dairy Science 75:1263-1272.

Horn, M. A., Matthies, C., Küsel, K., Schramm, A. and Drake, H. L. (2003). Hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis by moderately acid-tolerant methanogens of a methane-emitting acidic peat. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 69:74-83.

Hillman, K., Newbold, C. J. and Stewart, C. S. (1993). The contributions of bacteria and protozoa to ruminal forage fermentation in vitro, as determined by microbial gas production. Animal Feed Science and Technology 42:193-208.

Kirchgessner, M., Windisch, W. and Muller, H. L (1994). Nutritional factors for the Quantification of Methane Production. In Proc. XIII. International symposium on ruminal Physiology. pp. 333-348.

Lana, R. P., Russell, J. B. and Van Amburgh, M. E. (1998). The role of pH in regulating ruminal methane and ammonia production. Journal of animal science 76:2190-2196.

Lee, S. C., Lee, H. J. and Oh, Y. K. (2000). Methane production from enteric fermentation in ruminants. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 13:171-181.

Menke, K. H and Steingass, H. (1988). Estimation of the Energetic Feed Value obtained from Chemical analysis and In vitro Gas Production using Rumen Fluid. Animal Research and Development. 28,7-55.

Mosier, N., Wyman, C., Dale, B., Elander, R., Lee, Y. Y., Holtzapple, M. and Ladisch, M. (2005). Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresource technology 96:673-686.

Orpin, C. (1983). The Role of Ciliate Protozoa and Fungi in the Rumen Digestion of Plant Cell walls. An International Scientific Journal Covering Research on Animal Nutrition, Feeding and Technology 10:121-143.

Russell, J. B. (1991). Intracellular pH of Acid Tolerant Ruminal Bacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 57:3383-3384.

Serate, J., Xie, D., Pohlmann, E., Donald, C., Shabani, M., Hinchman, L. and Li, S. (2015). Controlling microbial contamination during hydrolysis of AFEX-pretreated corn stover and switchgrass: effects on hydrolysate composition, microbial response and fermentation. Biotechnology for biofuels 8:180.

Shi, J., Sharma-Shivappa, R. R., Chinn, M. and Howell, N. (2009). Effect of microbial pretreatment on enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation of cotton stalks for ethanol production. Biomass and bioenergy 33:88-96.

Sluiter, A., Hames, B., Ruiz, R., Scarlata, C., Sluiter, J., Templeton, D. and Crocker, D. (2008). Determination of structural carbohydrates and lignin in biomass. Laboratory analytical procedure 1617:1-16.

Stumm, C. K and Swart, K. B. (1986). Symbiosis of Protozoa and Hydrogen utilizing Methanogens. Microbiological Sciences 3:100.

Van Soest, P. J. (1983). Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant. O and B books Inc. Or. USA. 374 pp.

Vanwonterghem, I., Jensen, P. D., Rabaey, K. and Tyson, G. W. (2015). Temperature and solids retention time control microbial population dynamics and volatile fatty acid production in replicated anaerobic digesters. Scientific reports 5:8496.

Wilkie, A. C. (2008). Biomethane from Biomass, Biowaste and Biofuels. In Bioenergy; Wall J.D, Harwood C. S, Demain, A. (eds). ASM Press edition,Washington, pp. 195-205.

Williams, B. A, (2000). Cumulative Gas Production Techniques for Forage Evaluation. In: Forage Evaluation in Ruminant Nutrition (D.I. Givens, E. Owen, RFE Axford and HM(editors). Pp. 189-2011.

Zhao X. B., Zhang, L. H., Liu, D. H. (2012). Biomass Recalcitrance. Part II. Fundamental of different pretreatment to increase the enzymatic digestibility of lignocelluloses. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining 561-79.

Yang, Y., Sharma-Shivappa, R., Burns, J. C. and Cheng, J. J. (2009). Dilute acid pretreatment of oven-dried switchgrass germplasms for bioethanol production. Energy and Fuels 23:3759-3766