Developing an international cooperation training program for designing sustainable agriculture systems under the climate crisis era
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The results of the study were found stemically and holistically approached training program improved student’s environmental literacy. Students centered curriculum improve student’s environmental awareness, knowledge, skill, attitude and participation when the course finished. Place-based learning enlarged students’ skills and increased awareness and sensitivity which leaded to see the whole picture. The relationship between philosophy of training center and curriculum made synergy when it had the same goal. The results of the pre and post-test showed that 100 percent of the student’s awareness, skill reaches the hight level after the class. On knowledge, 94.12 percent of the students were high level after the class. The comparison of the student's attitudes and participation was higher than before with a statistical significance level of 0.05
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Altieri, M. A. (2004). Linking ecologist and traditional farmers in the search for sustainable agriculture. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2:35-42.
Forrester, J. W. (2007). System dynamics-A personal view of the first fifty years. System Dynamics Review, 23:345-358.
Green, C., Molloy, O. and Duggan, J. (2022). An Empirical Study of theImpact of Systems Thinking and Simulation on Sustainability Education. Sustainability, 14:394; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010394.
IPCC (2021). Climate change 2021: The Physical Seience Basis Summary for the olicymakers. Working Group, I Contribution to the Sixth assessment Report of the International Panel on climate Change, pp.10.
Poungsuk, P. (2020). Sustainable Agriculture Development for Future Human Security. Proceedings of A model of International Conference in Agricultural Technology (MICAT) 19 November 2020 at Green building, Faculty of Agriculrural Technology, KMITL, Ladkrabang, Bangkok, Thailand.
Sadalla, E., Ledlow, S. and Guhathakurta, S. (2019). I-6 Using System Dynamics Models of the Environment to Teach Sustainability Science: The Border+ 20 Model as a Pedagogical Device. ResearchGate: Berlin, Germany.
Schuler, S., Fanta, D., Rosenkraenzer, F. and Riess, W. (2018). Systems thinking within the scope of education for sustainable development (ESD) – a heuristic competence model as a basis for (science) teacher education. Journal of Geography in Higher Education. 42:192-204.
Solovova, N. V. (2018) Realization of Student-Centered Approach in Learning Environmental Knowledge, Ekoloji. 27:2095-2104.
Stave, K. (2010). Participatory system dynamics modeling for sustainable environmental management: Observations from four cases. Sustainability. 2:2762-2784; https://doi.org/10.3390/su2092762.
Sterman, J. (2000). Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. Irwin/McGraw-Hill: Boston, MA, USA.
UNESCO (2009). Review of contexts and Structures for Education for sustainable evelopment 2009. Document code: ED.2009/WS/41. pp.80.
NPUC (2021) Carbon Newutral Goal by Country Carbon Neutral Goals by Country - Motive Power (motive-power.com)