Management of promoting agriculture subjects through KLUAYTOD Model in an elementary school in Namnao, Phetchabun, Thailand
Main Article Content
Abstract
KLUAYTOD model was designed to develop and promote school agricultural learning and agricultural careers in the community. The participation in school development through the said activities which were consistent and in accordance with the community demand which was found at the highest level ( = 4.68). The school agricultural activities included organic vegetables gardening, herbal plants growing, rearing of animals such as egg-laying chicken, native chicken, frog, deer, and catfish (in a circular cement pond). Meanwhile, the agricultural careers in the community are promoted by the school for students, school personnel, and interested people which planted vegetable gardening, growing of maize, sweet tamarind, organic vegetable, highland temperate vegetable, para rubber, cut flower, and animal domestication, respectively. All these activities were practised in Namnao, Phetchaboon, Thailand. The integration of agricultural learning facilitations under the guidelines of KLUAYTOD model comprised of 7 main components: “courage”, “taking action”, “discipline and culture”, “sustainability”, “technology”, “quality organization”, and “good outcomes”. The model was tried out for the academic year of 2017-2018. There was a statistically significant difference at 0.05 of learning achievement before and after using the model. The 7 activities could develop students’ learning achievement effectively. Overall, the informants were satisfied at a high level in terms of agricultural learning activities and promoted agricultural careers in the community ( = 4.00 and 3.88). The sample groups were highly preferred organic vegetable gardening/egg-laying chicken rearing ( = 4.38 and 4.25) and herbal plant/maize growing ( = 4.46 and 4.32d). The said model was similarly appropriated and possibly adaptable for sustainable school development ( = 4.32). Moreover, the sample groups were satisfied with the experiment by the stakeholders at a high level ( = 3.99). The components such as “courage” ( = 4.48), “taking action” ( = 4.25), and “good outcomes ( = 4.25) were recorded at a highest level.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Boonmaphi, T., Tanya, S., Nakvichet, K. and Chaisuwan, S. (2018). A Model of Cooperating Status between the Small Sized Schools and Their Communities in the Upper Northern Thailand. NRRU Community Research Journal, 12:73-86.
Boonprasert, U. (2004). Research Report on the Study of Administrative and Management Guidelines of Educational Institutions in the form of School-based Administration. Bangkok: Kurusapa Printing Ladphrao.
Chaisiha, Y. and Ariratana, W. (2013). Administrative Factors Affecting School Based Management in the Schools under The Khon Kaen Municipality. Journal of Education Khon Kaen University (Graduate Studies Research), 7:140-150.
Chalakbang, W. (2017). Mixed Methods Research. Nakhon Phanom University Journal, 7:124-132.
Chiangkoon, W. (2016). Thai Educational conditions in 2014/2015 “How to Reform That Education to cope with the 21” Century World" Bangkok.
Ivanov, O. A., Ivanova, V. V. and Saltan, A. A. (2018). Likert-scale questionnaires as an educational tool in teaching discrete mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 49:1110-1118.
Leekitwattana, P. (2012). Educational Research Methodology. 8th edition. Faculty of Industrial Education and Technology, King Mungkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok: Mean Service Supply Ltd. Partnership.
Matliam, T. (2001). Reforming School Education as a Management Base. Bangkok: Sematham.
Ministry of Education Thailand. (2002). The National Education Act, B.E. 1999 and its amendments (No. 2), B. E. 2002. Bangkok: Parcel Delivery Organisation Press.
Office of Namnao District (2016). Commemerative Book of the Opening Ceremony of the Namnao District Office Building. Khonkaen: Pramuanwittaya Printing.
Office of the Basic Education Commission (2020). Policy of the Office of the Basic Education Commission. Bangkok: Policy Research and Development Group, Ministry of Education.
Office of the National Education Committee (2011). A Guideline for School Internal Assurance. Bangkok: Phimdi Ltd.
Office of the National Education Committee (2020). 1999 National Education Act. Amendment in 2003 and 2010. Bangkok: Ministry of Education.
Petsangsri, S. (2012). Blended Learning and Its Applications. Journal of Industrial Education, 11:1-5.
Phoonpat, J. (2010). Evolution of Thai Educational Administration. Textbooks and Academic Materials Center, Faculty of Education, Chulalongkorn University.
Poungsuk, P. (2018). The Agricultural Learning Center and the Transformation to the Age of Digital Society, Industrial Education journal, 17:1-7.
Poungsuk, P., Junlex, P. and Jaikaew, N. (2015). The problems and obstructions on teaching and learning of agricultural subject of agricultural teachers in Secondary School in Northeast Region of Thailand. Journal of Agricultural Technology, 11:459-471.
Puangsuk, P. (2017). Agricultural Education. Bangkok: Mean Service Supplies. 652 p.
Puangsuk, P. (2020). Philosophy of Sufficiency Economy and Agricultural Education. 4th edition, Bangkok: Mean Service Supplies. 303.
Punpinij, S. (2011). Research techniques in social science. 2nd Edition. Bangkok: Witthayaphat.
Rasee, T. and Poungsuk, P. (2015). Needs for Developing Sustainable Agricultural Learning Sources in Wangkwang Community, Nam Nao District, Phetchabun Province. Journal of Agricultural Technology, 11:2087-2098.
Saduak, A., Poungsuk, P. and Pourpan, N. (2017). Model for Development of Agricultural Skills under Occupation and Technology Subject (Agriculture) of Third Year Lower Secondary School Students using the School Agricultural Learning Center, Praibueng Wittayakom School, Srisaket Province, Thailand. International Journal of Agricultural Technology, 13:1849-1855.
Saduak, W., Poungsuk, P., Phonpakdee, R. and Deeying, S. (2019). School Agricultural Learning Center for Sustainable Agricultural Learning. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7:389-407.
Siriwan, N. (2014). Miscellaneous that Education in Agriculture: Important Issues to be Revised, 2nd edition. Bangkok: Mean Service Supply Ltd. Partnership.
Wongrakthai, K. (2005). Bringing the Policy on Quality Uplifting of a Small Learning Project into Practice: A Case Study of Baan Nakok and Baan Pangsa Schools. Non-Educational service Area 1 Lin published thesis Wittaradit, Rajabhat University.