Application of the API Approach to Promoting Sustainable Community Economy on a Forest Conservation Basis

Main Article Content

Suphachai Techanan

Abstract

This research article aims to present and apply the API (area-product-issue) approach as an agricultural extension tool for developing a sustainable community economy on a forest conservation basis. The conceptual framework was systematically synthesized using empirical findings from a primary study entitled Strategies for Sustainable Community Economic Development on a Forest Conservation Basis: A Case Study of the Agroforestry Enterprise of the Mae Lao Headwater Forest, Chiang Rai Province. A mixed-methods research design was employed, integrating participatory action research (PAR) with quantitative methods. Quantitative data were gathered from a sample of 110 member households of the community enterprise, complemented by qualitative data obtained through interviews with 20 key informants and focus group discussions. The empirical results indicated that the area possesses high natural resource potential suitable for agroforestry development within the montane forest and Class 1A watershed zones. The primary forest and agricultural outputs include Arabica coffee, Assam tea, and wild honey, which heavily rely on a resource base of over 80 bee flora species blooming rotationally throughout the area. However, the demographic and socio-economic analysis revealed critical structural gaps: 73.64% of the farmers belong to the aging population, and 62.73% earn a low average monthly household income ranging from 5,001 to 10,000 THB. Furthermore, the community faces significant constraints, including forest degradation, dry-season wildfire risks, and market accessibility gaps required to upgrade raw outputs into high-value, branded community products. The application of the API approach demonstrates its capacity to systematically integrate spatial potential (Area), product value-chain development (Product), and policy and environmental mitigation (Issue). Consequently, this approach yields localized development guidelines that eliminate redundancies, enhance agricultural extension efficiency, and offer scalability for replication in areas with similar contexts.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

กรมส่งเสริมการเกษตร. (2567). แผนปฏิบัติราชการ กรมส่งเสริมการเกษตร ระยะ 5 ปี (พ.ศ. 2566–2570) (ฉบับแก้ไขเพิ่มเติม). https://www.doae.go.th/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/masterplan66-70revision.pdf

กระทรวงทรัพยากรธรรมชาติและสิ่งแวดล้อม. (2561). แนวทางการจัดการทุนทรัพยากรธรรมชาติและสิ่งแวดล้อมเพื่อการพัฒนาเศรษฐกิจฐานรากอย่างยั่งยืน. สำนักงานนโยบายและแผนทรัพยากรธรรมชาติและสิ่งแวดล้อม. http://www.onep.go.th/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Base-economic-report-2561.pdf

สำนักงานคณะกรรมการพัฒนาการเศรษฐกิจและสังคมแห่งชาติ. (2560). แผนพัฒนาเศรษฐกิจและสังคมแห่งชาติ ฉบับที่ 12 (พ.ศ. 2560-2564). สำนักนายกรัฐมนตรี. https://www.nesdc.go.th/ewt_dl_link.php?nid=6422

สำนักงานสภาพัฒนาการเศรษฐกิจและสังคมแห่งชาติ. (2561). ยุทธศาสตร์ชาติ (พ.ศ. 2561–2580). สำนักงานเลขานุการคณะกรรมการยุทธศาสตร์ชาติ. http://www.nesdc.go.th/download/National%20Strategy/National%20Strategy%202561-2580.pdf

สำนักงานสภาพัฒนาการเศรษฐกิจและสังคมแห่งชาติ. (2565). แผนพัฒนาเศรษฐกิจและสังคมแห่งชาติ ฉบับที่ 13 (พ.ศ. 2566-2570). สำนักนายกรัฐมนตรี. https://www.nesdc.go.th/ewt_dl_link.php?nid=13051

Barca, F., McCann, P., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2012). The case for regional development intervention: Place-based versus place-neutral approaches. Journal of Regional Science, 52(1), 134-152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00756.x

Camagni, R. (2008). Regional competitiveness: Towards a concept of territorial capital. In R. Capello, R. Camagni, B. Chizzolini, & U. Fratesi (Eds.), Modelling regional scenarios for the enlarged Europe (pp. 33–47). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74737-6_3

Chambers, R. (1997). Whose reality counts? Putting the first last. Intermediate Technology Publications. https://doi.org/10.3362/9781780440453

Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill. https://archive.org/details/researchacttheor0000denz

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (2022a). Sustainable livelihoods approach and rural development. https://www.fao.org/rural-employment/work-areas/sustainable-livelihoods/en/

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (2022b). Natural resources and sustainable livelihoods. https://www.fao.org/family-farming/detail/en/c/1634673/

Kaplinsky, R., & Morris, M. (2001). A handbook for value chain research (Vol. 113). IDRC. https://www.intracen.org/uploadedFiles/intracenorg/Section_PDFs/Areas/Services/A-Handbook-for-Value-Chain-Research.pdf

Knowles, M. S. (1980). The modern practice of adult education: From pedagogy to andragogy (Revised ed.). Cambridge Adult Education. https://colllearning.info/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/The-Modern-Practice-of-Adult-Education.pdf

Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Island Press. https://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.356.aspx.pdf

Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195092691.001.0001

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2020). Multi-level governance for local development. https://www.oecd.org/regional/multi-level-governance.htm

Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807763

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=1587391

Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 76(6), 77-90. https://hbr.org/1998/11/clusters-and-the-new-economics-of-competition

Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2021). Creating shared value: How to reinvent capitalism and unleash a wave of innovation and growth. https://hbr.org/2011/01/the-big-idea-creating-shared-value

Pretty, J. N. (1995). Regenerating agriculture: Policies and practice for sustainability and self-reliance. World Development, 23(8), 1247-1263. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(95)00046-F

Putnam, R. D. (1993). The prosperous community: Social capital and public life. The American Prospect, 4(13), 35-42. https://prospect.org/api/v1/articles/55944/download/pdf/

Ray, C. (1998). Culture, intellectual property and territorial development. Sociologia Ruralis, 38(1), 3-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00060

Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations (3rd ed.). The Free Press. https://ocw.metu.edu.tr/file.php/118/Week9/rogers-doi-ch5.pdf

United Nations Development Programme. (2015). Human development report 2015: Work for human development. UNDP. https://hdr.undp.org/system/files/documents/global-report-document/hdr15globalreportpdf.pdf

World Bank. (2021). Payment for ecosystem services and sustainable forest management. https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/105341468332352606?utm_source=chatgpt.com

World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. Oxford University Press. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf