AGRICULTURAL AWARENESS AMONG HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS AND TEACHERS IN BENCHAMA MAHARAT SCHOOL UBON RATCHATHANI THAILAND

Main Article Content

Lancer Agravante
Dr.

Abstract

The study assessed agricultural awareness among students (grades 7-9) and teachers at Benchama Maharat School, Thailand. The student respondents, with a balanced gender ratio, were predominantly under 15 years old. Their parents were employed in government or business sectors, with higher education levels and incomes averaging ฿32,598.54 to ฿33,164.01. Teachers, aged 21-59, often held master's degrees and earned about ฿36,815.30 monthly. The internet was the primary information source for both groups.


Students displayed moderate agricultural knowledge (WMs 3.09-3.29), while teachers scored higher (WM 3.60). Attitudes were slightly positive, with students at 3.54-3.82 and teachers at 4.21. Engagement varied, with grade 7 and 8 students moderately involved (WMs 3.25 and 3.24), and grade 9 students and teachers more active (WMs 3.44 and 3.83).


Chi-square tests showed age, gender, grade level, and information access significantly influenced students’ agricultural awareness, while teachers’ awareness was affected by socio-economic factors.


Teachers had higher awareness levels than students, with significant differences confirmed by Tukey HSD tests. Grade 9 students differed in attitude from grade 7 students.


The study highlights the role of socio-demographic factors in agricultural awareness and suggests curricular enhancements to include practical agricultural experiences. The goal is to prepare students as informed citizens aware of agriculture’s significance. Recommendations for Benchama Maharat School include curriculum enrichment, teacher development, experiential learning, and community partnerships to foster agricultural understanding and value within society.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Akgul, H. C., & Macaroglu, E. (2011). Agricultural awareness for prospective teachers. Scientific research and essays, 6(16), 3371–3377.

Boonkhao, L., Phonkaew, S., Kwonpongsagoon, S., & Rattanachaikunsopon, P. (2022). Carbofuran residues in soil and consumption risks among farmers growing vegetables in Ubon Ratchathani Province, Thailand. AIMS environmental science, 9(5), 593–602. https://doi.org/- 10.3934/environsci.2022035

Durongkaveroj, W. (2022). Recent developments in basic education in Thailand: Issues and challenges (ADBI Working Paper No. 1322). Asian Development Bank Institute. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4204181

Ministry of Education (Thailand). (2008). Basic Education Core Curriculum B.E. 2551 (A.D. 2008). https://neqmap.bangkok.un- esco.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/- Basic-Education-Core-Curriculum.pdf

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2021). OECD Investment Policy Reviews: Thailand (OECD Investment Policy Reviews). https://doi.org/10.1787/c4eeee1c-en

Pongsrihadulchai, A. (2019). Thailand agricultural policies and development. https://ap.f- ftc.org.tw/article/1393

Poungsuk, P., & Junlek, P. (2021). Agricultural education system in Thailand: Policy and direction towards sustainable development goals. https://ap.fftc.org.t- w/article/2762.

Siriwan, N., Intorrathed, S., & Satiansiriwiwat, S. (2018). Integration of agricultural knowledge with the Thai Language, Mathematics, and Science subjects for first-year elementary school of Thailand. The new educational review, 51, 41–52.

Traimongkolkul, P., & Tanpichai, P. (2005). Lessons learned and present prospects: a critical review of agricultural education in Thailand. Journal of international agricultural and extension education, 12(3), 53-65.

Tukey, J. W. (1949). Comparing individual means in the analysis of variance. Biometrics, 5(2), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.2307- /3001913

Wongsasuluk, P., Chotpantarat, S., Siriwong, W., & Robson, M. (2014). Heavy metal contamination and human health risk assessment in drinking water from shallow groundwater wells in an agricultural area in Ubon Ratchathani province, Thailand. Environmental geochemistry and health, 36(1), 169–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-013-9537-8