DNA barcoding of two commercially important fish families (Carangidae and Lutjanidae) collected from Cuyo, Palawan, Philippines

Main Article Content

Templonuevo, R. M.
Alcantara, S.
Juanico, C. S.
Yambot, A.

Abstract

DNA barcoding has been proven as an effective and accurate tool for species identification all throughout the world. In this study, the technique was used to molecularly identify different species of the two major commercially important fish families (Carangidae and Lutjanidae) collected in Cuyo Island, Palawan. The island is a part of Coral triangle which is well recognized as a global apogee of marine biodiversity. It is also a major source of commercially important fishes being shipped to other neighboring provinces including Metro Manila. An estimated >600 base pair region of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene was amplified using four sets of universal primers. Fourteen high quality COI sequences were amplified and submitted to GenBank and IBOL database representing 7 species of carangids and 7 species of snappers. The generated sequences were compared to the published COI sequences in public databases and revealed 99-100% identity. Genetic distances were also calculated using Kimura-two parameter (K2P) model along with the construction of Neighbour-joining tree to support the identification. Overall, K2P distance was 20.3% with 22.5% and 20.5% genetic distances corresponding to interfamily and interorder divergences. A strong, cohesive and distinct clusters representing the taxonomic status of each of the species was also evident. Among the molecularly identified fishes in the island, one species of trevally, Caranx sexfasciatus was tagged with “decreasing population” by International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN). The inventory of these commercially important aquatic species in Cuyo Island, Palawan is important to identify their sources for export, domestic consumption and aquaculture purposes. It is also vital in implementing efficient assessment and management of the stocks. With the baseline information that is generated by the study, the fisherfolks will know the richness of their resources.

Article Details

How to Cite
Templonuevo, R. M., Alcantara, S., Juanico, C. S., & Yambot, A. (2018). DNA barcoding of two commercially important fish families (Carangidae and Lutjanidae) collected from Cuyo, Palawan, Philippines . International Journal of Agricultural Technology, 14(7), 2051–2066. retrieved from https://li04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/IJAT/article/view/10293
Section
Original Study

References

Alcantara, S. G. and Yambot, A. P. (2016). DNA barcoding of commercially important Grouper species (Perciformes, Serranidae) in the Philippines. National Center for Biotechnology Information. 6:3837-3845.

Ardura, A., Linde, A. R., Moreira, J. C. and Garcia-Vazquez, E. (2010). DNA barcoding for conservation and management of Amazonian commercial fish. Biological Conservation. 143:1438-1443.

Armstrong, K. F. and Ball, S. L. (2005). DNA barcodes for biosecurity: invasive species identification. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 360:1813-1823.

Avise, J. C. (2001). Phylogeography: The history and formation of species. American Zoology. 41:133-135.

Bingpeng, X., Heshan L., Zhilan, Z., Chunguang, W., Yanguo, W. and Jianjun, W. (2018). DNA barcoding for identification of fish species in the Taiwan Strait. PLoS ONE. 13:e0198109.

BFAR (2012). Status and Facts of Municipal Fishing in Cuyo Island. Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources. Cuyo, Palawan, Philippines. pp.3.

BFAR (2017). Monthly Consolidated for Landed Fishery Products for the Month of January-December 2017. Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources. Cuyo, Palawan, Philippines. pp.12.

Bhattacharjee, M. J., Laskar, B. A., Dhar, B. and Ghosh, S. K. (2012). Identification and re-evaluation of freshwater catfishes through DNA barcocing. PLoS One. 7:e49950.

Blaxter, M. (2003). Molecular systematics — counting angels with DNA. Nature. 421:122-124.

Calmin, G., Belbahri, L. and Lefort, F. (2007). Direct PCR for DNA barcoding in the genera Phytophopthora and Pythium. Biotechnoly and Biotechnological Equipment. 21:40-42.

Collins, M. D., Lawson, P. A., Willems, A., Cordoba, J. J., Fernandez-Garayzabal, J., Garcia, P., Cai, J., Hippe, H. and Farrow, J. A. E. (1994). The phylogeny of the genus Clostridium: Proposal of five new genera and eleven new species combinations. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology.44:812-826.

Costa, F. O., Landi, M., Martins, R., Costa, M. H., Costa, M. E., Carneiro, M., Alves, M. J., Steinke, D. and Carvalho, G. R. (2012). A ranking system for reference libraries of DNA barcodes: application to marine fish species from Portugal. PLoS One. 7:e35858.

Dangan, F. V. (2006). Contrastive Analysis of True and False Cognates in Filipino and Cuyonon. Tenth International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, Puerto Princesa City, Palawan, Philippines. pp.10.

Dayrat, B. (2005). Towards integrative taxonomy. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 8:407-415.

De Carvalho, D. C., Oliveira, D. A. A., Pompeu, P. S., Leal, C. G., Oliveira, C. and Hanner, R. (2011). Deep barcode divergence in Brazilian freshwater fishes: the case of Sao Francisco River Basin. Mitochondrial DNA. 22:80-86.

Frézal, L. and Leblois, R. (2008). Four years of DNA barcoding: current advances and prospects. Infection Genetics and Evolution. 8:727-36.

Hajibabaei, M., Singer, G. A. C., Hebert, P. D. N. and Hickey, D. A. (2007). DNA barcoding: how it complements taxonomy, molecular phylogenetics and population genetics. Elsevier. 24:167-172.

Hebert, P. D. N., Cywinska, A., Ball, S. L. and de Waard, J. R. (2003a). Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B. 270:313-321.

Hebert, P. D. N., Ratnasingham, S. and deWaard, J. R. (2003b). Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B. 270:96-99.

Hebert, P. D. N., deWaard, J. R. and Landry, J. F. (2009). DNA barcodes for 1/1000 of the animal kingdom. Biology Letters. 6:359-362.

Holmlund, C. M. and Hammer, M. (1999). Ecosystem services generated by fish populations. Ecological Economics. 29:253-268.

Hoegh-Guldberg, O., Hoegh-Guldberg, H., Veron, J. E. N., Green, A., Gomez, E. D., Lough, J., King, M., Ambariyanto, Hansen, L., Cinner, J., Dews, G., Russ, G., Schuttenberg, H. Z., Peñafl or, E. L., Eakin, C. M., Christensen, T. R. L., Abbey, M., Areki, F., Kosaka, R. A., Tewfik, A. and Oliver, J. (2009). The Coral Triangle and Climate Change: Ecosystems, People and Societies at Risk. WWF Australia, Brisbane. pp. 276.

Hubert, N., Hanner, R., Holm, E., Mandrak, N. E., Taylor, E., Burridge, M., Watkinson, D., Dumont, P., Curry, A., Bentzen, P., Zhang, J., April, A. and Bernatchez, L. (2008). Identifying Canadian freshwater fishes through DNA barcodes. PLoS One. 3:e2490.

Ivanova, N. V., Zemlak, T. S., Hanner, R. H. and Hebert, P. D. N. (2007). Universal primer cocktails for fish DNA barcoding. Molecular Ecology Notes. 7:544-548.

Iyiola, O. A., Nneji, L. M., Mustapha, M. K., Nzeh, C. G., Oladipo, S. O., Nneji, I. C., Okeyoyin, A. O., Nwani, C. D., Ugwumba, O. A., Ugwumba, A. A. A., Faturoti, E. O., Wang, Y., Chen, J., Wang, W. Z. and Adeola, A. C. (2018). DNA barcoding of economically important freshwater fish species from north- central Nigeria uncovers cryptic diversity. Ecology and Evolution. 8:6932-6951.

Kadarusman, Hubert, N., Hadiaty, R. K., Sudarto, Paradis E. and Pouyaud, L. (2012). Cryptic Diversity in Indo-Australian Rainbowfishes Revealed by DNA Barcoding:Implications for Conservation in a Biodiversity Hotspot Candidate. PLoS ONE. 7: e40627.

Kress, W. J., Wurdack, K. J., Zimmer, E. A., Weigt, L. A. and Janzen, D. H. (2005). Use of DNA barcodes to identify flowering plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.102:8369-8374.

Lakra, W. S., Verma, M. S., Goswami, M., Lal, K. K., Mohindra, V., Punia, P., Gopalakrishnan, A., Singh, K. V., Ward, R. D. and Hebert, P. N. D. (2011). DNA barcoding Indian marine fishes. Molecular Ecology Resources. 10:60-71.

Lievens, S., Goormachtig, S. and Holsters, M. (2001). A critical evaluation of differential display as a tool to identify genes involved in legume nodulation: looking back and looking forward. Nucleic Acids Research. 29:3459-3468.

Liu, S. Y. V., Ho, H. C. H. and Feng-Dai, C. (2013). A new species of Pomacentrus (Actinopterygii: Pomacentridae) from Micronesia, with comments on its phylogenetic relationships. Zoological Studies. 52:1-6.

Ma, K. Y. and Craig, M. T. (2018). An Inconvenient Monophyly: An Update on the Taxonomy of the Groupers (Epinephelidae). The American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists. 106:443-456.

Moore, W. S. (1995). Inferring phylogenetics from mtDNA variation: mitochondrial-gene trees versus nuclear-gene trees. Evolution. 49:718-726.

Moulton, M. J., Song, H. and Whiting, M. F. (2010). Assessing the effects of primer specificity on eliminating numt coamplification in DNA barcoding: a case study from Orthoptera (Arthropoda: Insecta). Molecular Ecology Resources. 10:615-627.

Munch, K., Boomsma, W., Willerslev, E. and Nielsen, R. (2008). Fast phylogenetic DNA barcoding. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. 363:3997-4002.

Okumu, I. and Çiftci, Y. (2004). Fish population genetics and molecular markers: II- Molecular markers and their applications in fisheries and aquaculture. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. 3:51-79.

Pereira, L. H., Hanner, R., Foresti, F. and Oliveira, C. (2013). Can DNA barcoding accurately discriminate megadiverse Neotropical freshwater fish fauna? .BMC Genetics. 20:1-14.

Qayoom, U., Pawar, R. A., Mohite, S. A., Sawant, M. S., Nirmale, V. H. Pawar, S. P., Goswami, M. and Lakra, W. S. (2018). DNA barcoding of some commonly exploited fishes from the northern Western Ghats, India. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences. 88:245-250.

Saitou, N. and Masatoshi, N. (1987). The neighbor-joining method—a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 4:406-425.

Saunders, G. W. (2005). Applying DNA barcoding to red macroalgae: a preliminary appraisal holds promise for future applications. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 360:1879-1888.

Suau, A., Bonnet, R., Sutren, M., Godon, J. J., Gibson, G. R., Collins, M. D. and Doré, J. (1999). Direct Analysis of Genes Encoding 16S rRNA from Complex Communities Reveals Many Novel Molecular Species within the Human Gut. American Society for Microbiology. 65:4799-4807.

Steinke, D., Vences, M., Salzburger, W. and Meyer, A. (2005). TaxI: a software tool for DNA barcoding using distance methods. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 360:1847-1857.

Verspoor, E. and Hammar, J. (1991). Introgressive hybridization in fishes: the biochemical evidence. Journal of Fish Biology. 39:309-334.

Vernooy, R., Haribabu, E., Muller, M. R., Vogel, J. H., Hebert, P. D. N., Schindel, D. E., Shimura, J. and Singer, G. A. C. (2010). Barcoding life to conserve biological diversity: beyond the taxonomic imperative. PLoS Biology. 8:417-1317.

Veron, J. E. N., DeVantier, L. M. and Turak, E. (2009). Delineating the coral triangle. Galaxea. 11:91-100.

Veron, J. E. N., DeVantier, L. M., Turak, E., Green, A. L., Kininmonth, S., Stafford-Smith, M. and Peterson, N. (2011). The Coral Triangle. In: Dubinsky Z, Stambler N ed. Coral Reefs: An Ecosystem in Transition, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. pp. 47-55.

Victor, B. C. (2007). Coryphopterus kuna, a new goby (Perciformes: Gobiidae: Gobiinae) from the western Caribbean, with the identification of the late larval stage and an estimate of the pelagic larval duration. Zootaxa. 1526:1-61.

Victor, B. C., Hanner, R., Shivji, M., Hyde, J. and Caldow, C. (2009). Identification of the larval and juvenile stages of the Cubera Snapper, Lutjanus cyanopterus, using DNA barcoding. Zootaxa. 2215:24-36.

Ward, R. D., Zemlak, T. S., Innes, B. H., Last, P. R. and Hebert, P. D. N. (2005). DNA barcoding Australia’s fish species. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B. 360:1847-1857.

Ward, R. D., Costa, F. O., Holmes, B. H. and Steinke, D. (2008). DNA barcoding of shared fish species from the North Atlantic and Australasia: minimal divergence for most taxa, but Zeus faber and Lepidopus caudatus each probably constitute two species. Aquatic Biology. 3:71-78.

Zemlak, T. S., Ward, R. D., Connell, A. D., Holmes, B. H. and Hebert, P. D. N. (2009). DNA barcoding reveals overlooked marine fishes. Molecular Ecology Resources. 1:237-242.

Zhang, J. (2011). Species identification of marine fishes in China with DNA barcoding. Evidence Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 10:1-10.

Zhang, J. and Hanner, R. (2011). DNA barcoding is a useful tool for the identification of marine fishes from Japan. Biochemical and Systematics Ecology. 39:31-42.