Biocontrol potential of an endophytic Pseudomonas sp. strain GEOT11 against phytopathogenic bacteria

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Jul 15, 2023
Keywords:
Phytopathogens Antagonism Pseudomonas Biological preparations Plant protection

Main Article Content

Aleksandrova, A. S.
Department of Botany and Microbiology, Faculty of Biology and Ecology, P.G. Demidov Yaroslavl State University, Yaroslavl 150003, Russia.
Bychkova, A. A.
Department of Botany and Microbiology, Faculty of Biology and Ecology, P.G. Demidov Yaroslavl State University, Yaroslavl 150003, Russia.
Zaitseva, Y. V.
Department of Botany and Microbiology, Faculty of Biology and Ecology, P.G. Demidov Yaroslavl State University, Yaroslavl 150003, Russia
Sidorov, A. V.
Department of Botany and Microbiology, Faculty of Biology and Ecology, P.G. Demidov Yaroslavl State University, Yaroslavl 150003, Russia
Trofimenko, V. R.
Department of Botany and Microbiology, Faculty of Biology and Ecology, P.G. Demidov Yaroslavl State University, Yaroslavl 150003, Russia.
Marakaev, O. A.
Department of Botany and Microbiology, Faculty of Biology and Ecology, P.G. Demidov Yaroslavl State University, Yaroslavl 150003, Russia.

Abstract

Pseudomonas species are promising objected for the creation of biological preparations. The growth-stimulating and antagonistic activity of Pseudomonas sp. strain GEOT11 was investigated. This strain proved to be expressed the ability to synthesize phytohormone, solubilize inorganic phosphate, and synthesize siderophores. Inoculation of Phaseolus vulgaris with Pseudomonas sp. GEOT11 stimulated and increased in the wet weight of plant organs and their linear size. Antagonistic activity of Pseudomonas sp. strain GEOT11 against phytopathogenic bacteria was demonstrated. Pseudomonas sp. GEOT11 effectively inhibited the growth of Pseudomonas siringae and Clavibacter michiganensis upon contact and by releasing volatile compounds, while the growth of Erwinia carotovora was only inhibited by the synthesis of volatile compounds. Co-inoculation of Phaseolus vulgaris with phytopathogenic bacteria and the studied strain led to be the healthy plants without signs of bacterial damage. Thus, the obtained data gave an evidence of the perspective use of the Pseudomonas sp. GEOT11 in agriculture to increase plant productivity and biocontrol of plant diseases.

Article Details

How to Cite
Aleksandrova, A. S., Bychkova, A. A., Zaitseva, Y. V., Sidorov, A. V., Trofimenko, V. R., & Marakaev, O. A. (2023). Biocontrol potential of an endophytic Pseudomonas sp. strain GEOT11 against phytopathogenic bacteria. International Journal of Agricultural Technology, 19(4), 1421–1434. retrieved from https://li04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/IJAT/article/view/10480
Issue
Vol. 19 No. 4 (2023): July
Section
Original Study
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

References

Abbaszadeh-Dahaji, P., Atajan, F. A., Omidvari, M., Tahan, V. and Kariman, K. (2021). Mitigation of Copper Stress in Maize (Zea mays) and Sunflower (Helianthus annuus) Plants by Copper-resistant Pseudomonas Strains. Current Microbiology, 78:1335-1343.

Ali, S., Isaacson, J., Kroner, Y., Soledad, S., Kandasamy, S. and Lazarovits, G. (2018). Corn sap bacterial endophytes and their potential in plant growth‑promotion. Environmental Sustainability, 1:341-355.

Berg, G., Müller, H., Zachow, C., Opelt, K., Scherwinski, K., Tilcher, R., Ulrich, A., Hallmann, J., Grosch, R. and Sessitsch, A. (2008). Endophytes: structural and functional diversity and biotechnological applications in control of plant pathogens. Simbiogenetics, 4:17-26.

Cheon, W. and Jeon, Y H (2014). First Report of Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum Causing Soft Rot of Orostachys japonica in Korea. Plant Disease, 98(7).

De Vrieze, M., Germanier, F., Vuille, N. and Weisskopf, L. (2018). Combining Different Potato-Associated Pseudomonas Strains for Improved Biocontrol of Phytophthora infestans. Frontiers in Microbiology, 9:1-13.

Doornbos, F. R., van Loon, L. C. and Bakker, A. P. (2012). Impact of root exudates and plant defense signaling on bacterial communities in the rhizosphere. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 32:227-243.

Durairaj, K., Velmurugan, P., Park, J. H., Chang, W. S., Park, Y. J., Senthilkumar, P. and Oh, B. T. (2018). Characterization and assessment of two biocontrol bacteria against Pseudomonas syringae wilt in Solanum lycopersicum and its genetic responses. Microbiological Research, 206:43-49.

Dutta, S., Yu, S. M. and Lee, Y. H. (2020). Assessment of the Contribution of Antagonistic Secondary Metabolites to the Antifungal and Biocontrol Activities of Pseudomonas fluorescens NBC275. The plant pathology journal, 36:491-496.

Etesami, H., Alikhani, H. A. and Hosseini, H. M. (2015). Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) production trait, a useful screening to select endophytic and rhizosphere competent bacteria for rice growth promoting agents. MethodsX, 2:72-78.

Grobelak, A., Kokot, P., Hutchison, D., Grosser, A. and Kacprzak, M. (2018). Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria as an alternative to mineral fertilizers in assisted bioremediation - Sustainable land and waste management. Journal of Environmental Management, 227:1-9.

Islam, M. A., Nain, Z., Alam, M. K., Banu, N. A. and Islam, M. R. (2018). In vitro study of biocontrol potential of rhizospheric Pseudomonas aeruginosa against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum. Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control, 28:90.

Kuznetsova, M. V., Pavlova, I., Karpunina, T. I. and Demakov, V.A. (2013). The experience of applying techniques of molecular genetics in identification of clinical strains Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Klinicheskaia laboratornaia diagnostika, 3:34-37.

Liu, F., Yang, S., Xu F., Zhang, Z., Lu, Y., Zhang, J. and Wang, G. (2022). Characteristics of biological control and mechanisms of Pseudomonas chlororaphis zm-1 against peanut stem rot. BMC Microbiology, 22:9-24.

Magnucka, E. G. and Pietr, S. J. (2015). Various effects of fluorescent bacteria of the genus Pseudomonas containing ACC deaminase on wheat seedling growth. Microbiological Research, 181:112-119.

Nandi, M., Macdonald, J., Liu, P., Weselowski, B. and Yuan, Z. C. (2018). Clavibacter michiganensis ssp. michiganensis: bacterial canker of tomato, molecular interactions and disease management. Molecular Plant Pathology, 19:2036-2050.

Oh, S. A., Kim, J. S., Park, J. Y., Han, S. H., Dimkpa, C., Anderson, A. J. and Kim, Y. C. (2013), The RpoS Sigma Factor Negatively Regulates Production of IAA and Siderophore in a Biocontrol Rhizobacterium, Pseudomonas chlororaphis O6. The Plant Pathology Journal, 29:323-329.

Onishchenko, G. G., Abaev, I. V., Dyatlov, I. A., Skryabin, Y. P., Korobova, O. V., Solov'ev P. V. and Bogun, A. G. (2014). Molecular genetic identification of Staphylococcus aureus strain, caused a foodborne illness outbreak in St. Petersburg in 2013. Annals Of The Russian Academy Of Medical Sciences, 69:33-38.

Peeters, N., Guidot, A., Vailleau, F. and Valls, M. (2013). Ralstonia solanacearum, a widespread bacterial plant pathogen in the post-genomic era. Molecular Plant Pathology, 14:651-662.

Priyanka, Agrawal, T., Kotasthane, A. S., Kosharia, A., Kuchwah, R., Zaidi, N. W. and Singh. U.S. (2017. Crop specific plant growth promoting effects of ACCd enzyme and siderophore producing and cynogenic fluorescent Pseudomonas. Biotechnology, 7:1-11.

Rodríguez, M., Torres, M., Blanco, L., Béjar, V., Sampedro, I. and Llamas, I. (2020). Plant growth-promoting activity and quorum quenching-mediated biocontrol of bacterial phytopathogens by Pseudomonas segetis strain P6. Scientific Reports, 10:1-12.

Shternshis, M. V. (2012). Trends of microbial pesticides biotechnology developed for plant protection in Russia. Tomsk State University Journal of Biology, 2:92-100.

Shcherbakov, A. V., Shcherbakova, E. N. and Mulinaet, S. A. (2017). Psychrophilic endophytic Pseudomonas as potential agents in biocontrol of phytopathogenic and putrefactive microorganisms during potato storage. Agrobiology, 52:116-128.

Sorokina, T. A., Lemanova, N. B., Lipasova, V. A. and Khmel, I. A. (1998). The antagonistic effect of the two Pseudomonas strains on phytopathogenic fungi and bacteria and prospects of the use of the strains for biological defence from plant diseases. Biotechnology, 2:37-43.

Syed, A. B., Rahman, S. F., Singh, E., Pieterse, C. M. J. and Schenk P. M. (2018). Emerging microbial biocontrol strategies for plant pathogens. PlantScience, 267:102-111.

Takishita, Y., Charron, J. B. and Smith, D. L. (2018). Biocontrol Rhizobacterium Pseudomonas sp. 23S Induces Systemic Resistance in Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Against Bacterial Canker Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis. Frontiers in Microbiology, 9:1-14.

Vieira, F. J. D., Nadal-Jimenez, P., Teixeira, L. and Xavier, K. B. (2020). Erwinia carotovora Quorum Sensing System Regulates Host-Specific Virulence Factors and Development Delay in Drosophila melanogaster. mBio, 11:1-17.

Zboralski, A., Biessy, A., Ciotola, M., Cadieux, M., Albert, D., Blom, J. and Filion, M. (2022). Harnessing the genomic diversity of Pseudomonas strains against lettuce bacterial pathogens. Frontiers in Microbiology, 13:1-15.

Zelentsov, S. V., Saenko, G. M., Moshnenko, E. V. and Budnikov, E. N. (2021). The primary cause for the development of bacterial blight of seeds in soybean and other leguminous crops. Oil Crops, 1:73-89.

Zhumakayev, A. R., Varga, M., Voros, M., Kocsube, S., Ramteke, P. W., Szekeres, A., Vagvolgyi, C., Hatvani, L. and Marik, T. (2022). Characterization of the antagonistic potential of the glyphosate-tolerant Pseudomonas resinovorans SZMC 25872 strain against the plant pathogenic bacterium Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13:1-21.