Chemometric approach to characterizing and comparing the quality of buffalo meat from Nakhon Phanom and Khammouane provinces
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The results indicated that a chemometric approach could effectively characterize different attributes in quality between buffalo meat from Nakhon Phanom (NP) province, Thailand and Khammouane (KM) province, Laos. Neither the unsupervised principal component analysis (PCA) model nor the supervised partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) model completely separated the NP and KM groups. However, the sparse PLS-DA model was able to successfully distinguish between the meat samples originating from KM versus NP. Interestingly, orthogonal projections to latent structures discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) exhibited superior discriminatory performances between regional meat samples. The robust OPLS-DA model used an orthogonal and a predictive factor, demonstrating a strong fit with R2X = 0.715, R2Y = 0.877 (P<0.001), and Q2Y = 0.803 (P<0.001). Consequently, two crucial variables were identified based on the selection criteria (VIP>2, P<0.05, FDR<0.05). Meat odors from sensors 1 (AUC=0.936, 95% CI: 0.841-0.989) and 4 (AUC=0.948, 95% CI: 0.843-1.000) could effectively distinguish between the NP and KM meats. In conclusion, the chemometric analysis successfully discerned regional quality differences and identified key discriminatory variables.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Akhtar, M. T., Samar, M., Shami, A. A., Mumtaz, M. W., Mukhtar, H., Tahir, A., Shahzad-ul-Hussan, S., Chaudhary, S. U. and Kaka, U. (2021). 1H-NMR-based metabolomics: An integrated approach for the detection of the adulteration in chicken, chevon, beef and donkey meat. Molecules, 26:4643.
AMSA (2012). Meat Color Measurement Guidelines. American Meat Science Association, IL, 124 p. Retrieved from: https://meatscience.org/publications-resources/printed-publica tions/amsa-meat-color-measurement-guidelines
AMSA (2016). Research Guidelines for Cookery, Sensory Evaluation, and Instrumental Tenderness Measurements of Meat, 2nd ed. American Meat Science Association, IL, 105 p. Retrieved from: https://meatscience.org/publications-resources/printed-publications/ sensory-and-tenderness-evaluation-guidelines
Anderson, S. (2007). Determination of fat, moisture, and protein in meat and meat products by using the FOSS FoodScan Near-Infrared Spectrophotometer with FOSS Artificial Neural Network Calibration Model and Associated Database: collaborative study. Journal of AOAC International, 90:1073-1083.
Andre, C. M. and Soukoulis, C. (2020). Food Quality Assessed by Chemometrics. Foods, 9: 897.
Anwar, H., Anwar, T. and Murtaza, S. (2023). Review on food quality assessment using machine learning and electronic nose system. Biosensors and Bioelectronics: X, 14:100365.
Arvanitoyannis, I. S. and van Houwelingen-Koukaliaroglou, M. (2003). Implementation of chemometrics for quality control and authentication of meat and meat products. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 43:173-218.
Bourne, M. C. (1978). Texture profile analysis. Food Technology, 32:62-67.
Chong, J., Wishart, D. S. and Xia, J. (2019). Using MetaboAnalyst 4.0 for comprehensive and integrative metabolomics data analysis. Current Protocols in Bioinformatics, 68:e86.
Eriksson, L., Jaworska, J., Worth, A. P., Cronin, M. T. D., McDowell, R. M. and Gramatica, P. (2003). Methods for reliability and uncertainty assessment and for applicability evaluations of classification- and regression-based QSARs. Environmental Health Perspectives, 111:1361-1375.
Garlito, B., Sentandreu, M. A., Yusà, V., Oliván, M., Pardo, O. and Sentandreu, E. (2023). New insights into the search of meat quality biomarkers assisted by Orbitrap Tribrid untargeted metabolite analysis and chemometrics. Food Chemistry, 407:135173.
Ghasemi-Varnamkhasti, M., Mohtasebi, S. S., Siadat, M. and Balasubramanian, S. (2009). Meat quality assessment by electronic nose (Machine olfaction technology). Sensors, 9:6058-6083.
Górska-Horczyczak, E., Guzek, D., Molęda, Z., Wojtasik-Kalinowska, I., Brodowska, M. and Wierzbicka, A. (2016). Applications of electronic noses in meat analysis. Food Science and Technology, 36:389-395.
Granato, D., Putnik, P., Kovačević, D. B., Santos, J. S., Calado, V., Rocha, R. S., Cruz, A. G. Da, Jarvis, B., Rodionova, O. Y. and Pomerantsev, A. (2018). Trends in chemometrics: Food authentication, microbiology, and effects of processing. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 17:663-677.
Han, F., Huang, X., H Aheto, J., Zhang, D. and Feng, F. (2020). Detection of beef adulterated with pork using a low-cost electronic nose based on colorimetric sensors. Foods, 9:193.
Héberger, K. (2008). Chapter 7 - Chemoinformatics—multivariate mathematical–statistical methods for data evaluation. In: Vékey K, Telekes A and Vertes A Ed., Medical Applications of Mass Spectrometry, pp.141-169.
Honikel, K. O. (1998). Reference methods for the assessment of physical characteristics of meat. Meat Science, 49:447-457.
Jia, W., Liang, G., Wang, Y. and Wang, J. (2018). Electronic noses as a powerful tool for assessing meat quality: a mini review. Food Analytical Methods, 11:2916-2924.
Kang, C., Zhang, Y., Zhang, M., Qi, J., Zhao, W., Gu, J., Guo, W. and Li, Y. (2022). Screening of specific quantitative peptides of beef by LC–MS/MS coupled with OPLS-DA. Food Chemistry, 387:132932.
Lê Cao, K. A., Boitard, S. and Besse, P. (2011). Sparse PLS discriminant analysis: biologically relevant feature selection and graphical displays for multiclass problems. BMC Bioinformatics, 12:253.
Liu, T., Guo, L., Wang, M., Su, C., Wang, D., Dong, H., Chen, J. and Wu, W. (2023). Review on algorithm design in electronic noses: challenges, status, and trends. Intelligent Computing, 2:12.
Magdalena Efenberger-Szmechtyk, A. N. and Kregiel, D. (2018). Implementation of chemometrics in quality evaluation of food and beverages. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 58:1747-1766.
Niu, X. Y., Shao, L. M., Dong, F., Zhao, Z. L. and Zhu, Y. (2014). [Discrimination of donkey meat by NIR and chemometrics]. Guang pu xue yu guang pu fen xi = Guang pu, 34:2737-2742.
Omar, L. and Ivrissimtzis, I. (2019). Using theoretical ROC curves for analysing machine learning binary classifiers. Pattern Recognition Letters, 128:447-451.
Pang, Z., Chong, J., Zhou, G., de Lima Morais, D. A., Chang, L., Barrette, M., Gauthier, C., Jacques, P. É., Li, S. and Xia, J. (2021). MetaboAnalyst 5.0: narrowing the gap between raw spectra and functional insights. Nucleic Acids Research, 49:W388-W396.
Pendrill, L. R., Melin, J., Stavelin, A. and Nordin, G. (2023). Modernising receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Algorithms, 16:253.
Phoemchalard, C, Tathong, T. and Pornanek, P. (2021a). The effects of sous-vide cooking on the physicochemical, microbiological, and carbon footprint of buffalo meat at various temperatures and times. International Journal of Agricultural Technology, 17:2235-2250.
Phoemchalard, C., Tathong, T., Pornanek, P., Uriyapongson, S. and Cherdthong, A. (2021b). Quality attributes of buffalo meat using precision sous vide cooking device. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 16:2117-2125.
Phoemchalard, C., Uriyapongson, S., Tathong, T. and Pornanek, P. (2022). 1H NMR metabolic profiling and meat quality in three beef cattle breeds from northeastern Thailand. Foods, 11:3821.
Putnik, P., Granato, D., Gomes Da Cruz, A., Ye Rodionova, O., Pomerantsev, A., Rocchetti, G., Lucini, L. and Bursac Kovacevic, D. (2019). Trends in chemometrics and meat products. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 333:012016.
Reis, M. M., Van Beers, R., Al-Sarayreh, M., Shorten, P., Yan, W. Q., Saeys, W., Klette, R. and Craigie, C. (2018). Chemometrics and hyperspectral imaging applied to assessment of chemical, textural and structural characteristics of meat. Meat Science, 144:100-109.
Rohman, A. (2019). The employment of Fourier transforms infrared spectroscopy coupled with chemometrics techniques for traceability and authentication of meat and meat products. Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research, 6:9-17.
Ryu, S., Muramatsu, T., Furihata, K., Wei, F., Koda, M., Miyakawa, T. and Tanokura, M. (2019). NMR-based metabolic profiling and comparison of Japanese persimmon cultivars. Scientific Reports, 9:15011.
Sarno, R. and Wijaya, D. R. (2019). Recent development in electronic nose data processing for beef quality assessment. Telkomnika, 17:337-348.
Tathong, T., Phoemchalard, C. and Pornanek, P. (2023). Effects of low-temperature long-time cooking conditions on the quality of sous-vide cooked pork loin and ham. International Journal of Agricultural Technology, 19:2293-2308.
Vlachos, A., Arvanitoyannis, I. S. and Tserkezou, P. (2016). An updated review of meat authenticity methods and applications. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 56:1061-1096.
Wang, X., Jiang, G., Kebreab, E., Li, J., Feng, X., Li, C., Zhang, X., Huang, X., Fang, C., Fang, R. and Dai, Q. (2020). 1H NMR-based metabolomics study of breast meat from Pekin and Linwu duck of different ages and relation to meat quality. Food Research International, 133:109126.
Wojnowski, W., Majchrzak, T., Dymerski, T., Gębicki, J. and Namieśnik, J. (2017). Electronic noses: Powerful tools in meat quality assessment. Meat Science, 131:119-131.
Ye, H., Yang, J., Xiao, G., Zhao, Y., Li, Z., Bai, W., Zeng, X. and Dong, H. (2023). A comprehensive overview of emerging techniques and chemometrics for authenticity and traceability of animal-derived food. Food Chemistry, 402:134216.
Zhang, C., Han, D., Li, X. and Wang, H. (2021a). Chemometrics-based method for analyzing and identifying tibetan pig and meat product thereof. Patent No. WO2021052366A1. Retrieved from https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2021052366A1/en
Zhang, R., Pavan, E., Ross, A. B., Deb-Choudhury, S., Dixit, Y., Mungure, T. E., Realini, C. E., Cao, M. and Farouk, M. M. (2023). Molecular insights into quality and authentication of sheep meat from proteomics and metabolomics. Journal of Proteomics, 276:104836.
Zhang, T., Chen, C., Xie, K., Wang, J. and Pan, Z. (2021b). Current state of metabolomics research in meat quality analysis and authentication. Foods, 10:2388.
