Cost structure and profitability analysis of integrated rice-aquaculture farming: A comparative study of landowners and tenants in Chachoengsao province, Thailand
Main Article Content
Abstract
The study was compared the costs and profits of a mixed rice-fish farming system between landowners and land tenants in Chachoengsao province, Thailand. At the farm level, the average total production cost was 6,118 THB per farm (averaging 20.46 rai), with variable costs accounting for 65.8% and fixed costs accounting for 34.2%. The main cost components included seed costs (416 baht per rai), chemical fertilizers (577 baht per rai), and land-related costs (opportunity costs for owners and rental costs for tenants) (1,535 baht per rai). Profitability analysis found that an average yield of 0.81 metric tons per rai, sold at 16.16 THB per kilogram, a net profit of 12,743 THB per rai, with a breakeven point of 233 kilograms per rai. There was not significantly differed in the overall performance indicators of the two clusters, namely total production cost per rai (p = 0.869), yield per rai (p = 0.823), net profit per rai (p = 0.241), and income per rai (p = 0.246). However, there were significantly differed in landowners who used more on seeds (p=0.029), whereas tenants incurred higher cash costs (p=0.004) and land rent (p<0.001) which obtained better market prices (p=0.027).
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Agritech and Innovation Center. (2023). Na Kha Wang farming Chachoengsao province local wisdom on sustainable agriculture. Retrieved from https://aic-info.moac.go.th/aic/knowledgedetail.php?way=PT13YXU5MmQ=&kl=PT1RTXdJVE8=
Ahmed, N. and Garnett, S. (2011). Integrated rice-fish farming in Bangladesh: Meeting the challenges of food security. Food Security, 3:81-92.
Choowaew, S., Ni, D., Kansuntisukmongkol, K. and Tri, N. (2019). Impact of saline intrusion and adaptation options on rice- and fish-farming households in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 40:427-433.
Department of Agricultural Extension (2023). The Department of Agricultural Promotion supports data for farmers registered with the Department of Agricultural Extension in the study area during the 2023–2024 production season. Retrieved from https://farmer.doae.go.th/
Ekins, P. and Zenghelis, D. (2021). The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability. Sustainability Science, 16:949-965.
Ganeshamoorthy, K. and Serasinghe, P. (2018). Comparative analysis of profits of paddy cultivation under owner-cultivated land and tenant-cultivated land. International Research Journal of Social Sciences, 7:1-10.
Gao, Y., Han, L., Adam, N., Urinov, B. and Wahab, A. (2025). Does economic inequality undermine the efficient use of natural resources? Evidence from Chinese provinces (2011–2020). Sustainable Futures, 10:101061.
Grigorieva, E., Livenets, A. and Stelmakh, E. (2023). Adaptation of agriculture to climate change: A Scoping Review. Climate, 11:202.
Handoyo, S., Suharman, H., Ghani, E. K. and Soedarsono, S. (2023). A business strategy, operational efficiency, ownership structure, and manufacturing performance: The moderating role of market uncertainty and competition intensity and its implication on open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9:100039.
Ibrahim, L. A., Shaghaleh, H., Abu-Hashim, M., Elsadek, E. A. and Hamoud, Y. A. (2023). Exploring the integration of rice and aquatic species: Insights from global and national experiences. Water, 15:2750.
Kerdsriserm, C. and Suwanmaneepong, S. (2024). Cost-Return and technical efficiency of rice production of Ban Nong Saeng rice mill community enterprise in Chachoengsao province, International Journal of Agricultural Technology, 20:1097-1110.
Lanuch, P., Mekhora, T. and Kantavichai, R. (2016). Analysis of cost and return of rice production in Phra Ajan Sub-district, Ongkarak district, Nakhonnayok province, A comparison between tenants and landowners. King Mongkut's Journal, 34:133-142.
Mankeb, P. (2016). Using computer for agriculture analysis. 2nd printing, School of Agriculture Technology. King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok.
Ministry of Commerce. (2023). Study on the trade situation and development of Thai rice products. Retrieved from https://uploads.tpso.go.th/press_release_eng_feb_23_final.pdf
Naseer, M. M., Guo, Y. and Zhu, X. (2025). Short-term costs and long-term gains of ESG initiatives in high-risk environments: Evidence from UK firms. Development and Sustainability in Economics and Finance, 7:100075.
Pochanasomboon, A., Attavanich, W. and Kidsom, A. (2020). Impacts of land ownership on the economic performance and viability of rice farming in Thailand. Land, 9(3):71; https://doi.org/10.3390/land9030071
Pongklang, P. (2016). Guideline on cost reduction of rice production. Kasetsart Applied Business Journal, 67:17-26. (in Thai)
Reddy, R. and Kishori, B. (2019). Integrated rice and aquaculture farming. In: aquaculture - plants and invertebrates. IntechOpen, London. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.78062.
Tarolli, P., Luo, J., Park, E., Barcaccia, G. and Masin, R. (2024). Soil salinization in agriculture: Mitigation and adaptation strategies combining nature-based solutions and bioengineering. iScience, 27:108830.
Villar, P. F., Kozakiewicz, T., Bachina, V., Young, S. and Shisler, S. (2023). The effects of agricultural output market access interventions on agricultural, socio-economic and food and nutrition security outcomes in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 19:e1348.
Zhou, W., Li, M. and Achal, V. (2025). A comprehensive review on environmental and human health impacts of chemical pesticide usage. Emerging Contaminants, 11:100410.