Expression of pathogenesis-related (PR) genes in tomato against Fusarium wilt by challenge inoculation with Streptomyces NSP3

Main Article Content

Vilasinee, S.
Toanuna, C.
McGovern, R. J.
Nalumpang, S.

Abstract

In a previous study, Streptomyces strain NSP3 was selected from the strong activity in vitro antifungal activity against various plant pathogenic fungi, and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici (Fol) isolate FolCK_117.  In this study, Streptomyces NSP3 was shown to be a biotic elicitor of priming agents that initiated plant defense responses to Fusarium wilt disease in tomato cv. ‘Bonny Best’.  The effects of seed treatment or soil application with the NSP3 and combination of the two methods were compared against challenge inoculation with FolCK_117.  The recognition event leading to expression of some plant defense-related genes, including PR-1a, Chi3, Chi9 and CEVI-1, was analyzed using real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) and normalized to the Actin gene at 0, 3, 6, 12 and 24 h post-inoculation (hpi).  The results implied that plants had strategy involved inducible defense reactions which are activated after elicitor applications within 24 hpi.  Combination of two described methods above was more effective for induction and accumulation of these PR proteins than either alone.  Gene expression of PR-1a was increased to maximum (73.1 fold) at 3 hpi.  Gene expression of Chi3 was remarkably increased at 24 hpi to 56.1 fold.  Gene expression of Chi9 and CEVI-1 were likewise increased to maximum at 12 hpi (50.7 and 43.3 fold, respectively).  These results suggested that Streptomyces NSP3 was a strong elicitor of plant defense responses. Understanding the bioactive component of defense induction may lead to a control strategy for Fusarium wilt disease in tomato.

Article Details

How to Cite
Vilasinee, S., Toanuna, C., McGovern, R. J., & Nalumpang, S. (2019). Expression of pathogenesis-related (PR) genes in tomato against Fusarium wilt by challenge inoculation with Streptomyces NSP3. International Journal of Agricultural Technology, 15(1), 157–170. retrieved from https://li04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/IJAT/article/view/8168
Section
Original Study

References

Agrios, G. N. (1997). Plant Pathology. 4th ed. San Diego, Academic Press, London, UK, 635 pp.

Berrocal-Lobo, M. and Molina, A. (2004). Ethylene response factor 1 mediates Arabidopsjs resistance to the soilborne fungus Fusarium oxysporum. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions Journal. 17:763-770.

Boominathan, U. and Sivakumaar, P. K. (2013). Bacillus megaterium (AUM72)-mediated induction of defense related enzymes to enhance the resistance of turmeric (Curcuma longa L.) to Pythium aphanidermatum causing rhizome rot. Agricultura. 10:1-8.

Cachinero, J. M., Hervas, A., Jimenez-Diaz, R. M. and Tena, M. (2002). Plant defense reactions against fusarium wilt in chickpea induced by incompatible race 0 of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris and nonhost isolates of F. oxysporum. Plant Pathology. 51:765-776.

Chen, S. C., Liu, A. R., Wang, F. H. and Ahammed, G. J. (2009). Combined overexpression of chitinase and defensin genesin transgenic tomato enhances resistance to Botrytis cinerea. African Journal of Biotechnology. 8:5182-5188.

Conn, V. M., Walker, A. R. and Franco, C. M. M. (2008). Endophytic actinobacteria induce defense pathways in Arabidopsis thaliana. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions. 21:208-218.

Conrath, U., Pieterse, C. M. and Mauch-Mani, B. (2002). Priming in plant-pathogen interactions. Trends in Plant Science. 7:210-216.

Durrant, W. E. and Dong, X. (2004). Systemic acquired resistance. Annual Review of Phytopathology. 42:185-209.

Frindlender, M., Inbar, J. and Chet, I. (1993). Biological control of soil borne plant pathogens by β-1,3-glucanase producing Pseudomonas cepacia. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 25:1211-1121.

Ito, S., Nagata, A., Kai, T., Takahara, H. and Tanaka, S. (2005). Symptomless infection of tomato plants by tomatinase producing Fusarium oxysporum formae speciales non-pathogenic on tomato plants. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology. 66:183-191.

Kämpfer, P. (2006). The Family Streptomycetaceae, Part I: Taxonomy. In: Dworkin M, Falkow S, Rosenberg E, Schleifer KH and Stackebrandt E ed. The Prokaryotes, A Handbook on the Biology of Bacteria, 3rd ed. New York, Springer. pp. 538-604.

Keen, N. T. (1990). Gene-for-gene complementarity in plant-pathogen interations. Annual Review of Genetics. 24:447-463.

Khan, S. T. (2011). Streptomyces associated with a marine sponge Haliclona sp.; biosynthetic genes for secondary metabolites and products. Environment Microbiology. 13:391-403.

Kuc, J. (1995). Induced systemic resistance an overview. In: Hammerschmidt R and Kuc J ed. Induced resistance to disease in plants. Boston, Kiuver Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. pp. 175-196.

Lechevalier, M. P. (1988). Actinomycetes in agriculture and forestry. In: Goodfellow M, Williams ST and Modarski M ed. Actinomycetes in Biotechnology. Academic Press.: San Diego. pp. 327-358.

Lehr, N. A., Schrey, S. D., Hampp, R. and Tarkka, M. T. (2008). Root inoculation with a forest soil streptomycete leads to locally and systemically increased resistance against phytopathogens in Norway spruce. New Phytologist. 177:965-976.

Livak, K. J. and Schmittgen, T. D. (2001). Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔCT method. Methods. 25:402-408.

McGovern, R. J. (2015). Management of tomato diseases caused by Fusarium oxysporum. Crop Protection. 73:78-92.

Mitsuhara, I., Iwai, T., Seo, S., Yanagawa, Y., Kawahigasi, H., Hirose, S., Ohkawa, Y. and Ohashi, Y. (2008). Characteristic expression of twelve rice PR1 family genes in response to pathogen infection, wounding, and defense-related signal compounds (121/180). Molecular Genetics and Genomics. 279:415-427.

Ramamoorthy, V., Raguchander, T. and Samiyappan, R. (2002). Induction of defense-related proteins in tomato roots reated with Pseudomonas fluorescens Pf1 and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici. Plant and Soil. 239:55-68.

Siegel, B. Z. (1993). Plant peroxidases-a organismic perspective. Plant Growth Regulation. 12: 303-312.

Silvar, C., Merino, F. and Díaz, J. (2008). Differential activation of defense-related genes in susceptible and resistant pepper cultivars infected with Phytophthora capsici. Journal of Plant Physiology. 165:1120-1124.

Singh, R. S. (2005). Plant diseases. 8th ed. Oxford & IBH Publishing Co.Pvt Ltd., New Delhi, India, 78 pp.

Suwan, N., Boonying, W. and Nalumpang S. (2012). Antifungal activity of soil actinomycetes to control chilli anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. International Journal of Agriculture Technology. 8:725-737.

Taheri, P. and Tarighi, S. (2012). The role of pathogenesis-related proteins in the tomato-Rhizoctonia solani interaction. Journal of Botany Article ID 137037. 6 p.

Vallad, G. E. and Goodman, R. M. (2004). Systemic acquired resistance and induced systemic resistance in conventional agriculture. Crop Science. 44:1920-1934.

van Loon, L. C., Rep, M. and Pieterse C. M. J. (2006). Significance of inducible defense-related proteins in infected plants. Annual Review of Phytopathology. 44:135-162.

van Loon, L. C. and van Strien E. A. (1999). The families of pathogenesis-related proteins, their activities, and comparative analysis of PR-1 type proteins. Physical of Molecular and Plant Pathology. 55:85-97.

Xue, L., Charest, P. M. and Jabaji-Hare, S. H. (1998). Systemic induction of peroxidases, 1,3-β-glucanases, chitinases, and resistance in bean plants by binucleate Rhizoctonia species. Phytopathology. 88:359-365.