Comparative Nutritional Composition of Azolla pinnata at Different Harvest Stages for Low-Cost Animal Feed Development

Authors

  • Sareena Semae Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Princess of Naradhiwas University, Narathiwat, Thailand
  • Masitoh Bindoloh Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Princess of Naradhiwas University, Narathiwat, Thailand
  • Muhammad Tawfid Masaleah SPJ Broiler Farm, 86/3 Village No. 3, Chobor Subdistrict, Yi-ngo District, Narathiwat Province, Thailand
  • Chamaiporn Singhapong Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Princess of Naradhiwas University, Narathiwat, Thailand

Keywords:

Azolla pinnata, harvest age, nutritional composition, crude protein, sustainable livestock feed

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the yield and nutritional composition of Azolla pinnata harvested at different growth stages (7, 14, and 21 days) to determine the optimal harvest age for use as a cost-effective livestock feed. A completely randomized design (CRD) with three treatments and three replications was applied. Fresh weight, dry weight, and dry matter content were measured, and chemical composition—including crude protein, ether extract, ash, organic matter, neutral detergent fiber (NDF), and acid detergent fiber (ADF)—was analyzed using standard AOAC International (2016); Van Soest et al. (1991) methods. Results showed no significant differences in yield parametersacross treatments (p > 0.05); however, significant changes in nutritional quality were observed (p < 0.05). Crude protein decreased with increasing harvest age (19.78% at 7 days to 14.90% at 21 days), while ADF increased significantly (10.93 % to 54.85 %). Ash content declined, whereas organic matter increased over time. The highest lipid content was recorded at 14 days (1.66 %). This study confirms that Azolla pinnata harvested at 7–14 days provides a superior nutritional profile with higher protein and lower fiber content compared to 21-day-old plants, without compromising biomass yield. This suggests a more precise harvest window for optimizing both feed quality and production efficiency. These findings support the use of early-harvested azolla as a viable alternative protein-rich feed resource for livestock, particularly in smallholder farming systems seeking low-cost, sustainable solutions.

References

Alalade, O.A., & Iyayi, E.A. (2006). Chemical composition of azolla (Azolla pinnata) Meal for Egg-Type Chicks. International Journal of Poultry Science, 5(2), 137 - 141. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2006.137.141

Anitha, K.C., Rajeshwari, Y.B., Prasanna Somerahally Basavaraju & Shilpashree, J. (2016). Nutritional evaluation of azolla as livestock feed. Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences, 4(6), 670 - 674. https://doi.org/10.18006/2016.4(Issue6). 670.674

AOAC International (2016). Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC INTERNATIONAL, (20th Ed.). Author.

Basak, B., Roy, B., & Sarker, S. (2022). Proximate composition of Azolla pinnata at different growth stages. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 35(7), 1032 – 1040. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.21.0815

Fayed, R.H., Salem, H.M., El-Nomeary, Y.A., El-Tarabany, A.A., El-Shennawy, M., & Abo El-Maaty, H.M. (2023). Effect of dietary inclusion of azolla meal on milk yield and blood metabolites in Zaraibi goats. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 10, 1101424. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1101424

Fiogbé, E. D., Micha, J. C., & Kestemont, P. (2004). Use of azolla as partial protein source in tilapia diets. Aquaculture Research, 35(1), 56 – 61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109. 2004.00984.x

Haryani, H., Norlindawati, A. P., Sharil Azwan, M. Z. & Mohamad Indrashahrin, B. (2022). The Effect of different harvesting days on yield and nutritive value of azolla (Azolla microphylla). Malaysian Journal of Veterinary Research, 13(2), 17 – 24. https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/ doi/abs/10.5555/20230329651

Khan, A., Ahmad, N., Rehman, Z., Ullah, M., Shah, A. A., & Khan, M. A. (2023). Effects of feeding Azolla pinnata on growth performance and nutrient utilization in Sahiwal calves. Pakistan Journal of Zoology, 55(1), 101–107. https://doi.org/10.17582/journal. pjz/20220516160542

SAS Institute Inc. (1996). SAS/STAT® user’s guide: Version 6 (4th ed.). Author.

Sirilak, S., & Prapai, W. (2014). Study on nutrient content of Azolla microphylla at different growth stages [Master’s thesis]. Thammasat University.

Tadavi, F.R., Patil, K.B., & Kadam, R.L. (2023). Azolla: Nutritional importance in animal feed and it’s composition. The Pharma Innovation Journal, 12(6S), 115 – 116. www.thepharma journal.com

Van Soest, P. J., Robertson, J. B., & Lewis, B. A. (1991) Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition." Journal of Dairy Science, 74(10), 3583 – 3597. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2

Downloads

Published

2025-12-26

How to Cite

Semae, S., Bindoloh, M., Masaleah, M. T., & Singhapong, C. (2025). Comparative Nutritional Composition of Azolla pinnata at Different Harvest Stages for Low-Cost Animal Feed Development. Journal of Life Science Agriculture and Technology, 4(2), 1–11. retrieved from https://li04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/psj/article/view/5797

Issue

Section

Reserch Article